Discourse(s) of Female Genitalia Mutilation vs. Cosmetic Surgery
Main Article Content
Abstract
There is a discrepancy between “Western” engagement with female genital mutilation (FGM) and female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS). Despite a similar ambiguity regarding the outcomes of each, FGM is ultimately condemned, while FGCS is permitted. By unpacking the dominant "Western" discourse(s) of each, this paper accounts for the discrepancy; FGCS is constructed as a medically legitimated option for enhancing the utility of one's genitals and for liberating one's sexuality, while FGM is constructed as a threat to "Western" conceptions of genital utility, sexuality and agency. Such discourse(s) arguably illustrate the tendency to condemn the contextual "other" and take “our” contextual constructions largely for granted.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Articles: USURJ’s current Publication Agreements apply a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC-BY-NC) by default. The CC BY-NC license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon work non-commercially. The author(s) can choose a different CC license, as outlined in https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/. Please see the PDF for each article to determine what license is applied to that article. Author(s) can also request to reserve all copyright (All Rights Reserved). If there is no indication for articles published before September 2020, assume the author retains all rights beyond those necessary for publication by USURJ. All articles published after September 2020 will apply one of the aforementioned CC licenses. See the Publication Agreement under the Submission Preparation Checklist or Author Guidelines for more information. Artwork: All copyright for the original artwork remains with the artist unless they wish to apply a Creative Commons (CC) license to the artwork. Please see the PDF for each artwork to determine what license is applied to that artwork.